On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 11:48:02AM +0100, Lubomir Rintel wrote: > CPAN search also looks in module abstracts.
That doesn't mean you shouldn't try and pick a good name. > > A better name would be Protocol::WL, since that namespace is already in use > > on PAUSE. > > See the module submission mail for discussion on the naming. WL is absolutely meaningless on first sight as a namespace. Expanding the acronym or adding a qualifier for what area it related to would be good. WL as a namespace on its own is terrible. -- Matt S Trout - Shadowcat Systems - Perl consulting with a commit bit and a clue http://shadowcat.co.uk/blog/matt-s-trout/ http://twitter.com/shadowcat_mst/ Email me now on mst (at) shadowcat.co.uk and let's chat about how our CPAN commercial support, training and consultancy packages could help your team.
