[sorry for the double message, I am not sure if the first one went through from an other adresse.]
Le jeudi 03 janvier 2013 à 07:38 +0400, brian d foy a écrit : > The Test::* namespace has a bit of a problem in that people now expect > the modules to do Test::Builder sorts of things. If you're doing > something completely different, the trick is to set your stuff apart > somehow. I'm okay to move this package elsewhere, but something in the line of Test::NotBuilder::Subs would seems a little too self depreciative. What I will do is add a warning in the documentation that I am not using Test::Builder If that seems OK. > However, before you go off to do a lot of work, I'll point out that > this sounds like what I already do with Test::More subtests: > [...] > If you still want a separate module, that's not a problem. Since I > don't have any ideas on a better name, if you still want the original > name, that's not a problem either. You're probably right that the name is far from perfect because the anonymous block syntax serves to define tests and not subtests in Test::Subs (the name is about anonymous subroutines, not sub-tests). However other names which I though of were centered around the “block” part of “anonymous code block”, but Test::Blocks or Test::WithBlock are even more confusing due to Test::Block package. So I believe that I will stick to the name if you (perl.modules) agree with this. Regards, Mathias
