On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 05:11:30PM +0100, Matt S Trout wrote: > On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 09:50:41AM -0400, David Golden wrote: > > (b) "Mitosis" model -- a comaintainer uploads a dist with new modules > > added (without using "X_authority" metadata or from before that was > > supported by PAUSE). The comaintainer is getting "primary" because of > > the act of uploading based on their "comaint" authority and PAUSE > > doesn't know any better. > > It's the latter. Normally we keep them centralised under a single user; > in the case of Schema::Loader, ILMARI, which had been correctly done. In the > case of Model::DBIC::Schema, MSTROUT, which appears not to have been done.
Actually, it has. So we're fine. Caelum, please either resume committing and allow some actual code review or fork; I've done nothing abusive here, I'm simply attempting to bring some structure to the development process. I'm sorry you believe that I'm refusing to merge branches because I hate you and am inventing reasons, rather than because I have genuine technical concerns. If you would like somebody else to review your work instead of me I'm happy to discuss who would be acceptable to both of us. The *only* use of PAUSE admin privileges I made was to switch to ILMARI to modify Schema::Loader permissions, and I believe he told you he was happy with my having done that. I have not touched your account. As such, this is not a matter for modules@perl.org and I won't be replying here any further. -- Matt S Trout - Shadowcat Systems - Perl consulting with a commit bit and a clue http://shadowcat.co.uk/blog/matt-s-trout/ http://twitter.com/shadowcat_mst/ Email me now on mst (at) shadowcat.co.uk and let's chat about how our Catalyst commercial support, training and consultancy packages could help your team.
