In article <[email protected]>, Steffen Mueller <[email protected]> wrote:
> brian is, of course, right, but since I just saw that the same process > was followed in 2008 by Jan Dubois*, I see no reason to not go with > granting co-maintenance quickly in this case. This makes me wish for a namespace history, so we could see every transaction that ever occurred. :) If PodMaster doesn't show up, I'd be happy to take primary maintainership so there's one person who can easily make maintainers while skipping the process. -- brian d foy (one of many PAUSE admins), http://pause.perl.org PAUSE instructions: http://pause.perl.org/pause/query?ACTION=pause_04about Archives: http://www.xray.mpe.mpg.de/mailing-lists/modules Please send all messages back to [email protected] with no CC to me.
