I would rather it be SQL::AbstractSyntaxTree because then someone would not have to "know" what AST meant to figure out if that is what needs to be used.
- RE: [RFC] SQL::AST (SQL Abstract Syntax Tree) - D... Avis, Ed
- [RFC] SQL::AST (SQL Abstract Syntax Tree) - ... Darren Duncan
- Re: [Poop-group] [RFC] SQL::AST (SQL Abs... Tim Bunce
- Re: [RFC] SQL::AST (SQL Abstract Syn... Darren Duncan
- Re: [RFC] SQL::AST (SQL Abstract... Matthew Simon Cavalletto
- Re: [RFC] SQL::AST (SQL Abs... Darren Duncan
- Re: [VPM] [RFC] SQL::AST (SQL Abstract S... Malcolm Dew-Jones
- Bob X