Kurt Starsinic writes: >On Jun 05, Sean M. Burke wrote: >> At 06:20 PM 2003-06-05 -0700, William R Ward wrote: >> >I really hope the admins don't accept this new US_DOD:: top-level >> >domain. I think it should go under the Doc::US_DOD:: hierarchy. There is >> >no Doc:: top-level hierarchy currently that I can find, so making a new >> >place for all modules that are solely documentation seems like a better >> >idea than making a new place for the Department of Defense. >> >> Doc::* seems reasonable to me. >> >> I'm idly curious how many other people (other that this Mugatu Ramses >> Kwashiorkor person) are really interested in publishing non-module >> non-perl* docs in CPAN. > > I've been thinking about that. Why would anybody go to CPAN >to look for DOD docs? It's certainly not where I would ever look.
Well it is an odd place, but if the docs are in POD form, and if they are installable using "perl Makefile.PL; make; make test; make install" and then viewable using "perldoc US_DID::Whatever" then I don't see any harm in it. I haven't seen the content of these modules so I don't know if that's how they work or not, but they should work that way if they don't. --Bill. -- William R Ward [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.wards.net/~bill/ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- "A foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds, adored by little statesmen and philosophers and divines." - Emerson
