On Wed, Jan 08, 2003 at 10:42:55AM -0800, Darren Duncan wrote: > > ... ramble, ramble, ramble ... > > Anyway, here are some new ideas I thought of for a framework name: > > - Cipher > - CipherDB > - DBCipher > - ResolveDB > - DBResolver > - InterpreDB > - DBInterpreter > - TranslateDB > - DBTranslator > - RosettaStone > - RosettaDB > ... etc > - PortableDB > - AbstractDB > > Personally, I like the "Cipher" options best (hence, listed first). What > do you think? > > Hopefully it won't be confused with encryption or anything. But "cipher" > actually has a broader meaning than that.
Few people are aware of that. "Cipher" would generally be taken to mean encryption (probably a database of ciphers in that case). There's no need for a framework name to be descriptive - so long as it doesn't imply something different. Of the suggestions above RosettaDB, or just Rosetta seems okay to me. Or there's always DuncanDB :) Tim.
