Seems reasonable. No need for the extra 'Tools' level. Tim.
On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 11:58:36AM -0000, Wim wrote: > As there are no other comments, could we agree on the namespace > Simulation::SynSim ? > > Wim > > _brian_d_foy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Wim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > > > Thanks, Tim. Brian suggested this top level: > > > > > > "i think you should break up that top level to make it more > > > general (and more expandable). for instance: > > > Simulation::Tools > > > > i could be wrong :) > > > > let's see what other comments people have. > > > > -- > > brian d foy (one of many PAUSE admins), http://pause.perl.org > > Module naming guidelines: > > http://www.cpan.org/modules/00modlist.long.html#ID2_Guidelinesf > > please send all messages back to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > >
