As there are no other comments, could we agree on the namespace Simulation::SynSim ?
Wim _brian_d_foy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Wim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Thanks, Tim. Brian suggested this top level: > > > > "i think you should break up that top level to make it more > > general (and more expandable). for instance: > > Simulation::Tools > > i could be wrong :) > > let's see what other comments people have. > > -- > brian d foy (one of many PAUSE admins), http://pause.perl.org > Module naming guidelines: > http://www.cpan.org/modules/00modlist.long.html#ID2_Guidelinesf > please send all messages back to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
