In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Scott Penrose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Monday, Nov 11, 2002, at 21:38 Australia/Melbourne, _brian_d_foy > wrote: > > how about Device::Power::Plasmatronic? > > They would be more logically grouped as Regulator. power regulators aren't the only sort of regulator though. i think you have to say something about power. > I am happy with Hardware::Regulator::Plasmatronic, or > Regulator::Plasmatronic, or even Device::Regulator::Plasmatronic. > We could even go for Power::Regulator::Plasmatronic. Device is the right top-level namespace. > But to replace Regulator with the word Power is probably not totally > desirable. what other sort of power devices are there? i guess regulators are different than batteries, but i can't think of other examples. is the Plasmatronic a product name or a company name? that is, does Plasmatronic completely identify the device, so is it like calling every modem a 3Com? if it is very specific, you might get around the Regulator part of the name. -- brian d foy (one of many PAUSE admins), http://pause.perl.org please send all messages back to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
