In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Scott Penrose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
How about Hardware::Power::Regulator::Plasmatroniclet's not use Hardware.do you really need Power and Regulator?
No
They would be more logically grouped as Regulator.how about Device::Power::Plasmatronic?
Grouping them as Power would be like grouping everything to do with data storage. eg: Data::File::Open, Data::DBI. Regulators are a specific group of devices.
I am happy with Hardware::Regulator::Plasmatronic, or Regulator::Plasmatronic, or even Device::Regulator::Plasmatronic.
We could even go for Power::Regulator::Plasmatronic.
But to replace Regulator with the word Power is probably not totally desirable.
Of course the most important word is Plasmatronic (the brand of the regulator and protocol) so if the strong feeling is for Device::Power::Plasmatronic then I will go with that.
Scott
---- brian d foy (one of many PAUSE admins), http://pause.perl.org please send all messages back to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Scott Penrose
Anthropomorphic Personification Expert
http://search.cpan.org/search?author=SCOTT
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dismaimer: While every attempt has been made to make sure that this email only contains zeros and ones, there has been no effort made to guarantee the quantity or the order.
