On Mon, Nov 11, 2002 at 12:21:44PM +0000, Tim Bunce wrote: > Actually it raises the opposite issue... A general guideline for > modules is that they should be named for what they do not how they > do it. > > So the "WebService" category should only be used where "what the > module does" is closely related to the fact it uses a web service.
> Given what I've said above and what I understand of your module it > seems like Lingua:: would be the best category to use. > > So I'd suggest something like Lingua::LEOTranslate, or perhaps a > Lingua::Translate::LEO module that offers both a minimal plugin > to Lingua::Translate and also a more full-features API for applications > that "use Lingua::Translate::LEO;" directly. Lingua::Translate::LEO seems fine for me. Joerg
