Yes, of course. I have badly expressed that.
Sorry.
adulau
On Tue, 30 Jul 2002, Tim Bunce wrote:
> I think OpenSST::* may make more sense - module design etc.
>
> Tim.
>
> On Tue, Jul 30, 2002 at 04:56:32PM +0200, Perl Authors Upload Server wrote:
> >
> > The following module was proposed for inclusion in the Module List:
> >
> > modid: OpenSST
> > DSLIP: bmpOg
> > description: Module to build OpenSST messages
> > userid: ADULAU (Alexandre Dulaunoy)
> > chapterid: 14 (Security_and_Encryption)
> > communities:
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensst-developer
> >
> > similar:
> >
> > rationale:
> >
> > OpenSST is a generic message and protocol to create transaction.
> > Transaction can be signed, crypted and some specific information.
> > The main issue is OpenSST could be part of multiple Namespace like
> > Crypt:: or Signature::... But is more a generic encapsulated
> > message. So OpenSST seems a better choice.
> >
> > enteredby: ADULAU (Alexandre Dulaunoy)
> > enteredon: Tue Jul 30 14:56:28 2002 GMT
> >
> > The resulting entry would be:
> >
> > OpenSST bmpOg Module to build OpenSST messages ADULAU
> >
> >
> > Thanks for registering,
> > The Pause Team
> >
> > PS: The following links are only valid for module list maintainers:
> >
> > Registration form with editing capabilities:
> >
>https://pause.perl.org/pause/authenquery?ACTION=add_mod&USERID=69100000_36f58a4891c8a53e&SUBMIT_pause99_add_mod_preview=1
> > Immediate (one click) registration:
> >
>https://pause.perl.org/pause/authenquery?ACTION=add_mod&USERID=69100000_36f58a4891c8a53e&SUBMIT_pause99_add_mod_insertit=1
>
>
>
