At 12:15 PM -0500 1/31/02, Chris Nandor wrote:
>At 11:42 -0500 2002.01.31, Dan Sugalski wrote:
>>Mac::Carbon could potentially run on OS 9, while the Cocoa module
>>couldn't. If you don't think that's a problem, I'll go with it. (I
>>don't much care, I just need to call it something...)
>
>Right, but it is for Mac. I'd also recommend something for Windows XP go
>under Win32::. Anyone else with thoughts?
Well, I'm sold. Mac::Foundation and Mac::Cocoa. Off to code...
--
Dan
--------------------------------------"it's like this"-------------------
Dan Sugalski even samurai
[EMAIL PROTECTED] have teddy bears and even
teddy bears get drunk
