At 8:00 AM -0500 1/31/02, Chris Nandor wrote:
>At 00:52 -0500 2002.01.31, Dan Sugalski wrote:
>>I'm writing modules to interface to Cocoa on OS X. I'm unsure as to
>>whether I should be working with Foundation:: and Cocoa::, or
>>OS_X::Foundation and OS_X::Cocoa. (I'd prefer the former pair, but
>>space under OS_X or OSX would be OK.
>
>I would prefer Mac::Cocoa::. There is already a plan for a Mac::Carbon.
Mac::Carbon could potentially run on OS 9, while the Cocoa module
couldn't. If you don't think that's a problem, I'll go with it. (I
don't much care, I just need to call it something...)
--
Dan
--------------------------------------"it's like this"-------------------
Dan Sugalski even samurai
[EMAIL PROTECTED] have teddy bears and even
teddy bears get drunk
