On Sun, Sep 16, 2001 at 06:57:41AM -0700, Vipul Ved Prakash wrote:
> I have retracted the VERSION patch for the moment for two reasons: Perl
> versions are real numbers, and your patch treats them like canonical
> version strings. This might cause a problem in future, eg when we go from
> 0.3 to 0.11; in perl 0.3 > 0.11.
i see. that's quite reasonable. :) but how about sprintf()'ing so it reads
0.003 => 0.011, or just using the v0.3.11 notation?
> Also, CVS insists on starting revision numbers with 1.x. I am sure there's
> a way to force it to use 0.x, I just haven't figured it out yet.
i'm using perforce, and have no idea about cvs. :)
> A question for those reading the SDK list and [EMAIL PROTECTED]: should I
> upload sidekick to CPAN?
as the sidekick script utilizes plenty of CPAN.pm function, how about
abstract it to a module named CPAN::SDK, and work toward an integration
with Bundle / MakeMaker so i could 'make sdk' or query SDKs from cpan> prompt?
just my two cents,
/Autrijus/
PGP signature
