On Mon, Sep 17, 2001 at 02:03:18PM -0700, Chris Radcliff wrote:
> Kirrily Robert wrote:
>  > WSDL should probably be under WWW::WSDL, I guess.
>  >
> 
> I'm not certain about that. What is the primary concern? If it's a
> namespace collision, WSDL isn't likely be a common term for any other
> technology. If it's a namespace conservation issue, I'd prefer XML::WSDL
> in order to disentangle the XML processor aspect from the transport aspect.

    It's a namespace conservation issue.  We set fairly high standards
for creation of top-level namespaces.  XML::WSDL sounds good to me, but
this is an issue that should be brought up on the Perl-XML mailing list
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.

    Regards,
    Kurt

Reply via email to