On Mon, Sep 17, 2001 at 02:03:18PM -0700, Chris Radcliff wrote: > Kirrily Robert wrote: > > WSDL should probably be under WWW::WSDL, I guess. > > > > I'm not certain about that. What is the primary concern? If it's a > namespace collision, WSDL isn't likely be a common term for any other > technology. If it's a namespace conservation issue, I'd prefer XML::WSDL > in order to disentangle the XML processor aspect from the transport aspect. It's a namespace conservation issue. We set fairly high standards for creation of top-level namespaces. XML::WSDL sounds good to me, but this is an issue that should be brought up on the Perl-XML mailing list <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. Regards, Kurt
- PAUSE registration request Vahe Sarkissian
- PAUSE registration request Robin Houston
- PAUSE registration request darren chamberlain
- PAUSE registration request Stephane Peiry
- Re: PAUSE registration request Kirrily Robert
- PAUSE Registration Request Rob Muhlestein
- Re: PAUSE Registration Request Kirrily Robert
- PAUSE registration request Chris Radcliff
- Re: PAUSE registration request Kirrily Robert
- Re: PAUSE registration request Chris Radcliff
- PAUSE Registration Request Kurt D. Starsinic
- PAUSE Registration Request Andrew . Savige
- PAUSE registration request Jamie Flournoy
- PAUSE registration request Kenneth Schumack
- Re: PAUSE registration request Andreas J. Koenig
- Re: PAUSE registration request Graham Barr
- Re: PAUSE registration request Ken Schumack
- Re: PAUSE registration request Andreas J. Koenig
- PAUSE registration request Bryan Jurish
- PAUSE registration request Jason W May
- PAUSE registration request Dan Harasty