[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> In reply to your message from the not too distant future: next Monday AD
> Reply-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Return-receipt-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Organization: a) Discordia b) none c) what's that?
> Content-Typo: gibberish, charset=ascii-art
> Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2000 17:59:19 -0500
> From: Jerrad Pierce <belg4mit>
>
> No offense Tim, but IMO
> File::Path does not seem to be an obvious package name
> The function names aren't really either, they make sense yes, but there's a
> precedence for mkdirhier(1)
IMO: the {mk,rm}tree already exist. They are there. For backward
compatibility they will always be. I'm not *opposing* your module,
just pointing out already existing functionality, against which your
work will be measured.
--
$jhi++; # http://www.iki.fi/jhi/
# There is this special biologist word we use for 'stable'.
# It is 'dead'. -- Jack Cohen
