In reply to your message from the not too distant future: next Monday AD
Reply-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Return-receipt-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Organization: a) Discordia b) none c) what's that?
Content-Typo: gibberish, charset=ascii-art
Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2000 17:59:19 -0500
From: Jerrad Pierce <belg4mit>
No offense Tim, but IMO
File::Path does not seem to be an obvious package name
The function names aren't really either, they make sense yes, but there's a
precedence for mkdirhier(1)
It differs in that:
mkdirhier: next version will use recursion
rmdirhier: does no chmod-ing...
both: status can be determined without trapping errors...
allows for use of any directory seperator
By the same token, how does File::Remove differ from File::Path::rmtree?
Not much. They both do their own recursion (so am I for that matter[rmdirhier],
though File::Recurse exists), and they both chmod.
JP
--
* __ * .
\ | / . . . . . ((_
_____ . . .
-- / \ -- . . . + . . _/\
oooooooooo. | * . . . * / ;M\_ .
.oooooooooooo.oo. . . . . /\ . / :IMM\
..oooooooooooo..oo. Jerrad Pierce /\ / \ / ;IIWMM
..oooooooooo....... 209 North Street + / \ / \ . / ;IIIIWM
...ooooooooo....... Randolph, MA 02368 / \ \ ___/ :;IIIIIWM
....ooo....o....... / \ \ / :: ;;IIIMI
.....ooo......... http://www.pthbb.org / \ \ : :::;IIIM
..ooooooo.... __________________________ || || ::.....::::::
MOTD on Boomtime, the 52nd of Chaos, in the YOLD 3166:
Tell no lies and I will ask no questions. (not!)
