On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 2:22 AM, Aristotle Pagaltzis <pagalt...@gmx.de> wrote:
... > In the real world people learn by copy-pasting code and tweaking until > it seems to do what they wanted. Every code example should be as close > to real working code as possible, ideally *should* be real working code; > or else so broken (by missing declarations and what have you) that it > cannot be made to work accidentally. ... > > No, I believe that was you. You provided no value WHATSOEVER – your > comment contained zero technical content, which Shlomi’s at least did, > even if it was off-topic. Well - actually I believe that this is something that needs some discussion - so I think it is positive that it was explained. The psychoanalitic rest was rather redundant - I agree. -- Zbigniew Lukasiak http://brudnopis.blogspot.com/ http://perlalchemy.blogspot.com/
