On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 9:28 PM, Bob Parker <b...@perldevgeek.com> wrote:
> > In this particular case, pretty much everyone clearly understood that what > was given was a GENERIC EXAMPLE, not real code. It didn't call for code > review, comment or criticism on the use of variables or their naming. What > was requested was feedback on the naming of the MODULE. If we're still talking about the "generic example": Publically available code with lexical $a or $b should always come with a "don't do this (unless you know why you should not do this)" warning. Then again, if we're now talking about "what was requested", I'll just note that your opinion of Shlomi Fish was not. Eirik
