On Feb 18, 2009, at 9:08 PM, Bill Ward wrote:
Still, that's bogus for ordinary hashes... it should only care about that for objects. Though I wonder how it could possibly know the difference.
Can we define an object as a blessed hash reference? And leave unblessed hashes available as little bundles of data?
We could distinguish between "objects" which are 100% encapsulated and "records" which are 0% encapsulated--just handy slates of public data.
2¢, Ezra
