David Nicol wrote: > On 5/8/07, Vadim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> no, it uses CFFI, so this should cover every implementation >> supporting that. > > > Ever since reading "Hackers and Painters" > http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN=0596006624/tipjartransactioA > I've been defending "Perl is a LISP!" (which is actually quite easy, > because > nobody knows what I'm talking about) > > Are there a lot of libraries and things written to CFFI? Perl could > provide > a CFFI interface, that would strengthen the "perl is a lisp" meme.
I'm not CFFI expert, so can't really comment. Looking at CFFI homepage at http://common-lisp.net/project/cffi/ this gives me an idea this is a LISP-only beastie... But, given SWIG provides support of CFFI, may be its already not so far distant from Perl... > > > > (answering to your other question) No, Inline:: approach is very different.. PS. I'll upload very first very unperfect version of Language::Lisp module to CPAN later today. Vadim.
