On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 08:39:28PM +0400, Vadim wrote:
> Adam Kennedy wrote:
>
> >
> > One alternative for the bridging stuff would be to look at using
> > something like Language::LISP.
>
> ...
>
> >
> > That tends to be a more common area for bridges to languages.
>
>
> Although there are different approaches within Language:: namespace
> ("bridge" connections like Language::Haskell, etc, and also "toy"
> implementations like Language::Basic) it is indeed common area for
> bridges to languages.
>
> So, I'll stick with Language::Lisp name.
If your module only connects to one LISP implementation, I'd urge you to
make sure you put that name in the namespace, eg Language::Lisp::CMUCL.
--
Benjamin Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
