On Sun, 14 Aug 2005, Ovid wrote:
No. I was trusting my boss's reasoning for not wanting to use P::V and
when I saw all of that documentation when I just wanted to check the
darned keys, I thought "I don't need all of that."
Well, it's definitely overhead. The question is if it's much more
overhead than some other function you write to handle checking for key
existence and assigning defaults.
Of course, I also whine quite a bit about Perl's awful argument
handling, so I suppose I should buck up and take a look at the module.
I'm just being silly not doing so.
I'd say so, but I'm biased ;)
I'm very much wishing that P::V can disappear entirely in Perl6, and I'm
probably going to confirm that on the p6l list, because in the end it's
just a nasty hack.
-dave
/*===================================================
VegGuide.Org www.BookIRead.com
Your guide to all that's veg. My book blog
===================================================*/
