----- Original Message -----
From: "Christopher Hicks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "module-authors perl list" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Johan Vromans"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, August 22, 2003 5:49 PM
Subject: Re: Another sticky module naming issue


> On Fri, 22 Aug 2003, Johan Vromans wrote:
>
> > Isn't it rather premature to start asking everyone to provide META.yaml
> > files while the file format and contents are still under development?
>
> Most of the people on this list would presumably be able to keep up with
> the evolution, no?  And if we don't play with it more there won't be any
> evolution to worry about.  :)
>

If module authors are expected to provide META.yaml files with their
distributions, then that technology should be mature and tested enough that
it can be included/recommended in the documentation such as 'perlnewmod'.
When I wrote my modules I followed those instructions scrupulously, and
because the current technology is well-tested, no one has ever had a problem
with uploading or downloading them.  Before I adopt a new procedure, I want
to know it's solid.  Then, I'll follow it down the line.

Reply via email to