Randy, I'm going to start building from scratch using ASF source + AS
source, using default compile options, and we'll see where it goes.
Have I mentioned lately how much I *hate* bootstrapping CPAN (for
prereqs) on Win32? :-p
Issac
Steve Hay wrote:
Randy Kobes wrote:
On Thu, 28 Feb 2008, Issac Goldstand wrote:
Steve Hay wrote:
Issac Goldstand wrote:
win32 (xp sp2, vc6 - no SDK upgrade) - Apache 1.41 binary -
ActivePerl 5.10 (build 1002) FAIL
(sorry, folks)
Segfault at startup.
I wonder if this is caused by mis-matched CRTs? ActivePerl is built
using VC6 (and therefore uses MSVCRT.dll). You're also using VC6 for
mod_perl, but where did that Apache binary come from? What compiler
was it built with?
Does it work if you build everything yourself from source with the
same compiler?
I'm reasonably sure that Apache's binaries are still being built
with vc6, which is what prompted me to test this particular set of
prerequisites (since binary Apache + binary ActivePerl will be the
assumed building blocks for a binary PPM package to be installed
upon). Bill, am I wrong about the compiler used for the ASF binary
release of apache-1.3 win32?
I also got a segfault at startup with ActivePerl 1002
(perl-5.10), using an ASF apache binary and VC++ 6.
All tests passed with the latest ActivePerl 8xx, based on
perl-5.8, using the same Apache binary and compiler.
Steve, is your Perl built using the ActivePerl sources,
with the same compile-time flags as ActivePerl?
No, mine is built from the "official" 5.10.0 source with my usual
configuration changes (USE_MULTI, USE_ITHREADS, USE_IMP_SYS and
USE_LARGE_FILES switched off, and PERL_MALLOC and DEBUG_MSTATS switched
on).
