Randy Kobes wrote: > On Thu, 28 Feb 2008, Issac Goldstand wrote: > >> Steve Hay wrote: >>> Issac Goldstand wrote: >>> >>>> win32 (xp sp2, vc6 - no SDK upgrade) - Apache 1.41 binary - >>>> ActivePerl 5.10 (build 1002) FAIL >>>> >>>> (sorry, folks) >>>> >>>> Segfault at startup. >>> >>> I wonder if this is caused by mis-matched CRTs? ActivePerl is built >>> using VC6 (and therefore uses MSVCRT.dll). You're also using VC6 for >>> mod_perl, but where did that Apache binary come from? What compiler >>> was it built with? >>> >>> Does it work if you build everything yourself from source with the >>> same compiler? >>> >> I'm reasonably sure that Apache's binaries are still being built >> with vc6, which is what prompted me to test this particular set of >> prerequisites (since binary Apache + binary ActivePerl will be the >> assumed building blocks for a binary PPM package to be installed >> upon). Bill, am I wrong about the compiler used for the ASF binary >> release of apache-1.3 win32? > > I also got a segfault at startup with ActivePerl 1002 > (perl-5.10), using an ASF apache binary and VC++ 6. > All tests passed with the latest ActivePerl 8xx, based on > perl-5.8, using the same Apache binary and compiler. > Steve, is your Perl built using the ActivePerl sources, > with the same compile-time flags as ActivePerl?
No, mine is built from the "official" 5.10.0 source with my usual configuration changes (USE_MULTI, USE_ITHREADS, USE_IMP_SYS and USE_LARGE_FILES switched off, and PERL_MALLOC and DEBUG_MSTATS switched on).
