Hi, amazingly it passed initial tests.. Still doing some tests on other stuff :) DBD::Mysql is one of the other things I'm still working out on Leopard. Once that's fixed, I can test if mod_perl and A2::P work for my app :)
I'll keep this list posted. Hendrik On Nov 11, 2007 8:09 PM, Fred Moyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hendrik Van Belleghem wrote: > > Hi, > > > > actually, I double checked.. rebuild Apache2::Request from scratch after > > removing every reference to existing A2::R.. Same error applies. > > I never loaded the module into the httpd.conf though. I stuck to using > > it as a replacement for CGI (but for mod_perl) :) > > So adding LoadModule apreq_module fixed it? > > > > > Hendrik > > > > On Nov 11, 2007 7:46 PM, Fred Moyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: > > > > Hendrik Van Belleghem wrote: > > > This fixed the compilation.. but when I loaded it in my code, it > spit > > > out the following message in my logs: > > > > > > dyld: lazy symbol binding failed: Symbol not found: > > _apreq_handle_apache2 > > > > I'm going to take a guess here and say that you have more than one > > version of libapreq installed. > > > > or... are you sure that you have LoadModule apreq_module > mod_apreq2.so > > pointing to the correct version of libapreq? > > > > > > > Referenced from: /Library/Perl/5.8.8/darwin > > > -thread-multi-2level/auto/APR/Request/Apache2/Apache2.bundle > > > Expected in: dynamic lookup > > > > > > dyld: Symbol not found: _apreq_handle_apache2 > > > Referenced from: > > > > > > /Library/Perl/5.8.8/darwin-thread-multi-2level/auto/APR/Request/Apache2/Apache2.bundle > > > Expected in: dynamic lookup > > > > > > Anyone any suggestions on how to fix this? > > > > > > Hendrik > > > > > > > > > On Nov 11, 2007 6:12 PM, Laurent MARTIN <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > <mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>> wrote: > > > > > > Hi there! > > > > > > I'm trying to install libapreq2 under my newly installed Mac > OS X > > > 10.5 on a MacBook Pro (Core Duo 2, SantaRosa), but something > > must be > > > wrong in what I'm doing as Apache refuses to launch as soon > > as I add > > > the following to the httpd.conf file: > > > LoadModule apreq_module libexec/apache2/mod_apreq2.so > > > Below is the message I get in the console: > > > httpd: Syntax error on line 509 of > > /private/etc/apache2/httpd.conf: > > > Cannot load /usr/libexec/apache2/mod_apreq2.so into server: > > > dlopen(/usr/libexec/apache2/mod_apreq2.so, 10): no suitable > > image > > > found. Did find:\n\t/usr/libexec/apache2/mod_apreq2.so: > > mach-o, but > > > wrong architecture > > > > > > FYI, I'm using the default softwares provided with Leopard: > > Apache > > > 2.2.6 & mod_perl 2.0.2 & Perl 5.8.8. > > > > > > What I'm typing to install libapreq2: > > > % perl Makefile.PL --with-apache2-apxs=/usr/sbin/apxs > > > % make > > > % sudo make install > > > > > > I've noticed the following message while compiling (make): > > > ld: warning in > > > > > /Users/laurent/Downloads/libapreq2-2.08 > /library/.libs/libapreq2.dylib, > > > file is not of required architecture > > > > > > If it can help, here is what I get when I apply the "file" > > command > > > on this .dylib file: > > > > > /Users/laurent/Downloads/libapreq2-2.08 > /library/.libs/libapreq2.dylib: > > > Mach-O dynamically linked shared library i386 > > > After having installed (sudo make install), here is what I > > get when > > > I apply the "file" command on the newly created and > > > installed /usr/libexec/apache2/mod_apreq2.so file: > > > /usr/libexec/apache2/mod_apreq2.so: Mach-O bundle i386 > > > Is this normal? Below is what I get for example for the > > mod_perl.so > > > file: > > > mod_perl.so: Mach-O universal binary with 4 architectures > > > mod_perl.so (for architecture ppc7400): Mach-O bundle ppc > > > mod_perl.so (for architecture ppc64): Mach-O 64-bit bundle > ppc64 > > > mod_perl.so (for architecture i386): Mach-O bundle i386 > > > mod_perl.so (for architecture x86_64): Mach-O 64-bit bundle > > x86_64 > > > Shouldn't I get the same for all .so file? Shouldn't > > mod_apreq2.so > > > be compiled as universal binary too? > > > > > > Any idea? Thank you very much in advance! > > > > > > -- > > > *Laurent*, Nantes (FR) - *http://blog.lmartin.fr* > > > < http://blog.lmartin.fr/> > > > /Apple MacBook Pro 15"/ > > > /Nokia Internet Tablet N800/ > > > /Palm Treo 650 (unlocked GSM)/ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Hendrik Van Belleghem > > > Spine - The backbone for your website - http://spine.sf.net > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Hendrik Van Belleghem > > Spine - The backbone for your website - http://spine.sf.net > > -- Hendrik Van Belleghem Spine - The backbone for your website - http://spine.sf.net