Hallo mksoft wrote: >> I know that this just working around the problem that lavrec does not >> support v4l2. By now we didn't find anybody that would change lavrec. ;) > > I'm pretty sure that this is far beyond my programming skills but still > I feel tempted to ask: > > How much effor is that expected to be? Would someone need deep knowledge > of the V4L1, V4L2 and lavrec-system to "port" it to v4l2?
If you dive it into parts like: getting a idea about v4l1 understanding the current code, getting a idea about v4l2 transforming the code testing you can get a feeling for the project It can be as simple as just changing the calls, but I fear that there can be some hidden traps. I also think that some parts are already changed. The code is well organized and documented, so the understanding the current code shouldn't be that hard. If you are interested want please give it a try. I can help with testing. auf hoffentlich bald, Berni the Chaos of Woodquarter Email: shadowl...@utanet.at www: http://www.lysator.liu.se/~gz/bernhard ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics Download AppDynamics Lite for free today: http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_mar _______________________________________________ Mjpeg-users mailing list Mjpeg-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mjpeg-users
