On Thursday 10 February 2005 03:19, Richard Ellis wrote: > On Wed, Feb 09, 2005 at 10:32:17PM +0000, John Gay wrote: > > Yes, but the POV-Ray team already have their hands full creating more > > interesting rendering effects than adding support for several non-square > > pixels that would only confuse everyone except us video making guys. > > You do make a valid point, and I'll concede that they very well may > be by far more interested in more effects than supporting non-square > pixel sizes. But you'd never know unless you asked, and the fact > that they support interlaced frames (which technically are > unnecessary for computer generated, computer displayed, and printed > images) makes me think they might be slightly amenable to the idea.
And, lo and behold; a quick search for "aspect" in the POV-Ray docs turn up the camera parameters top and right: > 2.3.1.1.6 Aspect Ratio > Together the up and right vectors define the aspect ratio (height to > width ratio) of the resulting image. The default values up<0,1,0> and > right<1.33,0,0> result in an aspect ratio of 4 to 3. This is the aspect > ratio of a typical computer monitor. If you wanted a tall skinny image > or a short wide panoramic image or a perfectly square image you > should adjust the up and right vectors to the appropriate proportions. You might want to hold that mail until you've looked through http://www.povray.org/documentation/view/3.6.1/246/ /Sam ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_ide95&alloc_id396&op=click _______________________________________________ Mjpeg-users mailing list Mjpeg-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mjpeg-users
