On Mon, 13 Dec 2004, Dik Takken wrote:

> Since my computer (Athlon 1400) is too slow to capture high quality, full 
> res MJPEG video, I consider buying a hardware MJPEG capture card. There 

        Hmmm, I didn't think cpu speed mattered all that much for 'capture'
        purposes but rather the speed of the I/O (disc) subsystem mattered
        a great deal.  For full frame high quality the data rates are such
        that you probably need to splice/raid-0 two drives together.

        An Athlon 1400 is probably too slow for the filtering + encoding
        phase of the process though (unless you're very patient ;)).

> is lots of info in the archives about a lot of famous MJPEG cards, but 
> most of them are no longer sold in the shop around the corner.

        Exactly - MJPEG is essentially "yesterday's technology" and the main
        source of MJPEG cards today is E-Bay or used equipment dealers.

        I believe Linux Media Labs still sells MJPEG cards - but at $430 or
        so (last I checked) they're considerably more expensive than a
        DV conversion box plus a (very inexpensive) IEEE1394 card.

> So, I'm looking for a decent hardware MJPEG capture card that is currently 
> available in computer stores. If MJPEG is still the best choice today, 

        It's not.  Much newer methods have become available.  For recording
        from TV there are the Hauppauge cards (PVR-250 and PVR-350) that will
        produce an MPEG stream directly with no encoding on your system.  THe
        downside of that is, of course, you do not have the chance to do
        any filtering (denoising for example).

        I do not know if the PVR-250 (or 350) can be used as a general
        purpose capture/encoding device (if a VHS deck can be attached) or if
        it's limited to signals received via the TV tuner section of the 
        card.

> that is. I have seen new (external) capture devices that can convert 
> analog video directly to DV and stream it directly to your harddisk. How 
> good/bad is the quality of these devices? Say I want to process the video 

        Depends which one you get - not all analog to DV conversion units
        are equal.  The Canopus product line is highly regarded (it's neither
        the most expensive nor the cheapest).   I have a Canopus ADVC100
        which is currently selling (in the US) for about $250 (less if you
        shop around a little).  The newer model, the ADVC300, has hardware
        denoising and a TBC (Time Base Corrector) builtin (and is a more
        expensive at around $470).

> after capturing and re-encode to MPEG2, does DV offer sufficient image 
> quality to do this or is an MJPEG capture card a better choice? Do 

        Most assuredly the quality is excellent.  It's what most of the
        camcoders use these days (DVCAM and DVCPRO are the "pro" versions
        and are used by movie makers and the broadcaset industry).

        I think the quality of DV is better - I know it's produced far
        better movies than the Bt878 based card ever did.

        Another advantage is that you don't have to resample the video from
        square pixels to video pixels.  Capturing at 640x480 (or 640x576) and
        then doing a quality resampling to 704xN for placement on a DVD adds
        extra time to the workflow (and any time of conversion/scaling at
        best will not degrade the image - it won't improve it!).

> external capture devices have a big advantage compared to internal capture 
> cards?

        As was mentioned in another reply - you can take the conversion box
        from machine to machine, don't have to open the system (and the 
        IEEE1394 devices are "hot pluggable" - you don't need to 
powerdown/reboot
        to change them).  And you can easily add more disk space to the
        system by using external discs that have a IEEE1394 interface.

        I recommend taking a look at the Canopus (http://www.canopus.com)
        line - the models 100 and 300 are the main ones to look at (no need
        to explore the 500 and 1000 unless you want to see what the "pro"s
        are using :)).

        Maybe others who have switched over to the DV (using kino and dvgrab)
        will jump in at this point with their tales.

        Cheers,
        Steven Schultz



-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. 
http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/
_______________________________________________
Mjpeg-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mjpeg-users

Reply via email to