On Mon, 13 Dec 2004 21:35:19 +0100 (CET), Dik Takken <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I would think that, since 12GB/hr is not exceptionally large, DV is still > a bit of a space/quality compromise compared to MJPEG. This video format > is not designed with video editing in mind, rather storage. MJPEG on the > other hand is designed for video editing, not for storage. It's way too > big for that. But maybe I'm wrong and the newer DV compression technology > also beats MJPEG quality wise.
Actually, DV is intended for editing. It is also possible to do simple cut/paste editing on MPEG without re-encoding. I have a Python library for doing so: http://mlug.missouri.edu/~markrages/software/python_mpeg/ Regards, Mark [EMAIL PROTECTED] ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/ _______________________________________________ Mjpeg-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mjpeg-users
