On Tuesday 05 October 2004 04:07, Roman Shaposhnick wrote: > > Such a format would open possibilities to mix different streams in real > > time, making it possible to toy with overlay graphics and stuff. > > Personally, I use DV for that. And not just any DV, but a hacked-up
Which, incidentally, is a format that cannot be produced by an MJPEG card without serious CPU usage and quality loss. DV may be the Future, but a Future not compatible with my hardware. > default framesize for PAL is 144000 bytes, this can be cut down to ~130000 > bytes without any quality loss. If you want more -- I think 30000 bytes per > frame should still watchable, which gives you a bitrate of 9600bps and all Indeed. My scripts have, for a number of reasons, standardized om a frame size of about 47000 bytes, half horizontal resolution, which most likely would amount to a frame size of about 94000 bytes, full horizontal resolution. But that's MJPEG, because that's what my card produce. I'm planning to bump it up in the future. 144000 bytes ought to be more than just watchable. > the benefits of sequentialable DV :-) It can't be all that hard to do it in MJPEG. I'll sit down some free weekend and give this business a good look. /Martin ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on ITManagersJournal Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of them. Give us Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to find out more http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl _______________________________________________ Mjpeg-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mjpeg-users
