On Sad, 2003-08-02 at 17:34, Steven M. Schultz wrote: > You can't go wrong with an AMD chipset. I've never thought much > of the VIA chips (problems abound with those it seems - the archives > of this group should have quite a few horror stories)
>From my own experience the later AMD chipsets are a *lot* better. The corruption and SBLive mess was a very good reason to worry about the older ones but not the newer stuff. > Alas, from what I've seen the best (but slightly more expensive) > way to get the AMD chipset is on a dual cpu board. You don't have > to run multiple cpus of course so you can save a bit of money that > way. AMD76x is slow by modern standards - look at the ram bandwidth and latency numbers. It also doesn't support the newest processors. Except for the "need a ps/2" mouse they seem very reliable. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now. Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET. http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100003ave/direct;at.aspnet_072303_01/01 _______________________________________________ Mjpeg-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mjpeg-users
