OK.... Sorry for the confusion.... I was under the impression that mjpegtools will not work with V4L2 compatible drivers at all...
Rett Ronald Bultje ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > >Hi Rett, > >On Wed, 2003-02-05 at 22:22, Rett Walters wrote: >> I sorry I don't have any input to this issue, but I was under >> the impression the`MJPEG tools wasn't compatible with V4L2 yet, >> and had been told by people on this list. Is this not the >> case? It appears that this person (Chris BW) is using V4L2 >> and Mjpegtools..... > >Well, the drivers might do both v4l2 and v4l1, and mjpegtools will just >use the v4l1 interface. We're not incompatible with it, we just don't >use it (yet). > >Ronald > > > > >------------------------------------------------------- >This SF.NET email is sponsored by: >SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! >http://www.vasoftware.com >_______________________________________________ >Mjpeg-users mailing list >[EMAIL PROTECTED] >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mjpeg-users > ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com _______________________________________________ Mjpeg-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mjpeg-users
