Re: spamd -G whiteexp not honored?

[Daniel Perup]

As you can see, the default 36 days are still in effect.

spamdb(8) doesn't talk to spamd(8) when whitelisting, not even to 
receive
the whiteexp value.  It just manipulates spamd's database using 
default
values.

Ok. I've verified this by looking at entries added by spamd as opposed 
to spamdb, and sure enough, the whiteexp value is in effect for spamd. 
Maybe spamdb should have an option for setting whiteexp when adding 
entries?

Anyway, thanks.

    Daniel