Op Mon, 01 Nov 2010 20:08:00 +0100 schreef Daniel Perup <dan...@perup.net>:
I'm having problems with spamd and the -G option. It seems that spamd
does not honor the whiteexp value at all, but uses the default value at
all times:
That is a sweeping statement, coming from just one test case.
# pkill spam
# /usr/libexec/spamd -G 4:10:500
# /usr/libexec/spamd-setup -D
# /usr/libexec/spamlogd
# spamdb -a 1.2.3.4
# spamdb|grep 1.2.3.4
WHITE|1.2.3.4|||1288600451|1288600451|1291710851|1|0
# date -r 1288600451
Mon Nov 1 09:34:11 CET 2010
# date -r 1291710851
Tue Dec 7 09:34:11 CET 2010
As you can see, the default 36 days are still in effect.
spamdb(8) doesn't talk to spamd(8) when whitelisting, not even to receive
the whiteexp value. It just manipulates spamd's database using default
values.
This happens with
all the whiteexp values I have tried, from 50 to 5000. I am using OpenBSD
4.6, but I have not seen anything related to this in the newer
changelogs.
It should be easy for someone on 4.7 (or 4.8) to verify if this
behaviour is still there.
Thanks,
Daniel
--
Gemaakt met Opera's revolutionaire e-mailprogramma:
http://www.opera.com/mail/
