On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 12:09 AM, Dmitry-T <dmitr...@yandex.ru> wrote:
> dd only example.
> Look around: Linux, Mac OS X, FreeBSD... why defend a design error?

I just wanted to wonder, what are You doing here if You think that
OpenBSD developpers are incompetent and tend to protect any of their
deQisions regardless its quality?

If this is the case, then OpenBSD must be fundamentally insecure and
thus entirely missing its own saling point, so it must be of no
interest to You.

Otherwise, may be it would a better idea to understand a reason for
such a design before any argument occures?

--
Dmitrij D. Czarkoff

Reply via email to