Just curious, but why not "man route"? On 9/22/10, Beavis <pfu...@gmail.com> wrote: > Greetings List, > > > I would like to ask if someone has done routing via pf(4) (non-NAT > rules). My idea is to be able to route packets from one interface to > the other. say from tun0 to rl0. I've been googling a lot and most of > the rules im seeing have something to do with NAT routes. > > any help would be awesomely appreciated. > > > thanks, > -b > -- > () ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail > /\ www.asciiribbon.org - against proprietary attachments > >
-- Sent from my mobile device http://www.glumbert.com/media/shift http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tGvHNNOLnCk "This officer's men seem to follow him merely out of idle curiosity." -- Sandhurst officer cadet evaluation. "Securing an environment of Windows platforms from abuse - external or internal - is akin to trying to install sprinklers in a fireworks factory where smoking on the job is permitted." -- Gene Spafford learn french: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=30v_g83VHK4
