2010/9/10, Andy Bradford <amb-sendok-1286721307.iadidoklmfcciicnc...@bradfords.org>: > Why would you need 65k UDP for DNS? Almost all UDP based DNS responses > are under 512 bytes, those that are larger are required to set the > truncated bit and the client restart the query using TCP.
We have probably too many wild users because the logs were flooded by "named: not enough free resources" from connect() failing with ENOBUFS. DNS traffic is altq'd in high priority lowdelay queue. Any more clever solution? -- Martin Pelikan
