This works for me with kernel ppp:

http://archive.psg.com/gprs-vickers.txt


/Pete


On 23. mai 2010, at 02.52, J.C. Roberts wrote:

> On Sat, 22 May 2010 22:08:57 +0200 patrick kristensen
> <kristensenpatri...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Thanks for taking the time to answer and your fast replies.
>>
>
> Actually, ppp and TDMA/CDMA are nice break from the other headaches I've
> been trying to solve. ;)
>
> First of all, you either haven't mentioned the name of your service
> provider, or I forgot what it was. Either way, it matters.
>
> From what I can tell, you're in Spain, and I'm not familiar with the
> providers there.
>
> Ted Roby recently posted his config for Virgin Mobile:
> http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-tech&m=127285929411780&w=2
>
> The above may not help, but it's nice to see working examples.
>
>> In absence of cdce (using ue0 as ethernet interface (and minicom) to
>> connect to isp) i have tried several ppp and pppd configurations to
>> get a working internet connection on -release with no success.
>>
>> The following is my ppp (# ppp -auto movistar) and pppd (# pppd call
>> movistar) attempts.
>
> Since pppd(8) is in the kernel, it can be faster, but since ppp(8) is
> in userland, it can be much easier to work with when figuring things
> out. Once you figure out how to make things work with ppp(8), you can
> easily write a new config for pppd(8).
>
>
>>
>> /etc/ppp/ppp.conf  (appended to ppp.conf.sample)
>>
>> movistar:
>>      set device /dev/cuaU0
>>      set speed 460800
>>      set timeout 0
>>      set dial "ABORT BUSY TIMEOUT 5 \
>>              \"\" \
>>              AT OK-AT-OK \
>>              AT+CFUN=1 OK-AT-OK \
>>              AT+CPIN? +CPIN:\\sREADY-AT+CPIN\\\"****"\\\"-OK \
>
> The above looks wrong. Not all wireless service providers and not
> all cellular wireless devices require using the Personal Identification
> Number (PIN) when making a connection. And worse, the responses you
> can get varies from device to device. (see below)
>
> Also, it is unwise to post your PIN to a public mailing list. It's not
> too dangerous without the IMEI and MEID device, but it's still not a
> good idea.
>
>>              AT+CGDCONT=1,\\\"IP\\\",\\\"movistar.es\\\" OK \
>
> The above is most likely wrong. The AT+CGDCONT= command sets the primary
> CONText of the device and the network it is attaching to. The first
> value argument states whether or not the device can be reconfigured (1),
> or cannot be reconfigured (3). The second argument is a string which
> defines the protocol used on the network. The third argument is also
> a string and it defines the Packet Data Network (PDN) name or Access
> Point Name (APN).
>
> As far as I know "movistar.es" is not the proper name of any Packet Data
> Network (PDN) or Access Point Name (APN). For example Virgin Mobile uses
> "VDATA" as the APN/PDN name, while AirTel uses "airtelgprs.com" as the name
> and of course, what your provider uses is unknown.
>
> You need to be careful with this setting since many providers have multiple
> data networks. With Verizon here in the silicon valley, I can choose from
> three different data networks (actually four if you count EVDO Rel. 0 as a
> different network than EVDO Rev. A).
>
>>              "ATDT*99***1#"
>>
>
> The above is wrong because it has no timeout or 'CONNECT'. Also, you should
> have noticed the leading double quote (") which is prematurely ending
> your chat script *BEFORE* the required number is dialed. The above should
be:
>
>       \\dATDT*99***1# TIMEOUT 30 CONNECT"
>
> The leading "\\d" gives a two second delay before calling. It may or may
not
> be necessary with your hardware/provider.
>
>>
>>      set mtu maximum 750
>
> The above is most likely wrong.
>
>>      resolv rewrite
>
> The above is often unnecessary to get things working, but rewriting
> /etc/resolv.conf is mostly a matter of personal choice/needs. The
> command you have below, namely `enable dns` should suffice.
>
>>      set ifaddr 10.0.0.1/0 10.0.0.2/0 255.255.255.0 0.0.0.0.
>>      add default HISADDR
>>      enable dns
>>
>> #    ./.
>>
>>
>>
>> /var/log/ppp.log
>>
>> May 22 17:57:51 x200s ppp[8742]: Phase: Using interface: tun0
>> May 22 17:57:51 x200s ppp[8742]: Phase: deflink: Created in closed
>> state May 22 17:57:51 x200s ppp[8742]: tun0: Command: default: set
>> device /dev/cuaU0 May 22 17:57:51 x200s ppp[8742]: tun0: Command:
>> default: set speed 460800 May 22 17:57:51 x200s ppp[8742]: tun0:
>> Command: default: set dial ABORT BUSY ABORT NO\\sCARRIER TIMEOUT 5 ""
>> AT OK-AT-OK ATE1Q0 OK \\dATDT\\T TIMEOUT 40 CONNECT
>> May 22 17:57:51 x200s ppp[8742]: tun0: Command: movistar: set
>> device /dev/cuaU0 May 22 17:57:51 x200s ppp[8742]: tun0: Command:
>> movistar: set speed 460800 May 22 17:57:51 x200s ppp[8742]: tun0:
>> Command: movistar: set timeout 0 May 22 17:57:51 x200s ppp[8742]:
>> tun0: Command: movistar: set dial ABORT BUSY TIMEOUT 5
>>              ""              AT OK-AT-OK             AT
>> +CFUN=1 OK-AT-OK AT+CPIN? +CPIN:\\sREADY-AT+CPIN\\"7291\\"-OK AT
>> +CGDCONT=1,\\"IP\\",\\"movistar.es\\" OK ATDT*99***1# May 22 17:57:51
>> x200s ppp[8742]: tun0: Command: movistar: set mtu maximum 750 May 22
>> 17:57:51 x200s ppp[8742]: tun0: Command: movistar: resolv rewrite May
>> 22 17:57:51 x200s ppp[8742]: tun0: IPCP: Primary nameserver set to
>> 255.255.255.255 May 22 17:57:51 x200s ppp[8742]: tun0: Command:
>> movistar: set ifaddr 10.0.0.1/0 10.0.0.2/0 255.255.255.0 0.0.0.0.
>> May 22 17:57:51 x200s ppp[8742]: tun0: Command: movistar: add default
>> HISADDR May 22 17:57:51 x200s ppp[8742]: tun0: Command: movistar:
>> enable dns May 22 17:57:51 x200s ppp[3315]: tun0: Phase: PPP Started
>> (auto mode). May 22 17:57:51 x200s ppp[3315]: tun0: Phase: bundle:
>> Establish May 22 17:57:51 x200s ppp[3315]: tun0: Phase: deflink:
>> closed -> opening May 22 17:57:51 x200s ppp[3315]: tun0: Phase:
>> deflink: Connected! May 22 17:57:51 x200s ppp[3315]: tun0: Phase:
>> deflink: opening -> dial May 22 17:57:51 x200s ppp[3315]: tun0: Chat:
>> deflink: Dial attempt 1 of 1 May 22 17:57:51 x200s ppp[3315]: tun0:
>> Chat: Send: AT\^M May 22 17:57:51 x200s ppp[3315]: tun0: Chat: Expect
>> (5): OK May 22 17:57:51 x200s ppp[3315]: tun0: Chat: Received:
>> May 22 17:57:51 x200s last message repeated 2 times
>> May 22 17:57:51 x200s ppp[3315]: tun0: Chat: Received: \^M
>> May 22 17:57:51 x200s ppp[3315]: tun0: Chat: Received: \^M
>> May 22 17:57:51 x200s ppp[3315]: tun0: Chat: Received: AT\^M\^M
>> May 22 17:57:51 x200s ppp[3315]: tun0: Chat: Received: OK\^M
>> May 22 17:57:51 x200s ppp[3315]: tun0: Chat: Send: AT+CFUN=1\^M
>> May 22 17:57:51 x200s ppp[3315]: tun0: Chat: Expect(5): OK
>> May 22 17:57:51 x200s ppp[3315]: tun0: Chat: Received: AT+CFUN=1\^M\^M
>> May 22 17:57:51 x200s ppp[3315]: tun0: Chat: Received: OK\^M
>> May 22 17:57:51 x200s ppp[3315]: tun0: Chat: Send: AT+CPIN?\^M
>> May 22 17:57:51 x200s ppp[3315]: tun0: Chat: Expect(5): +CPIN: READY
>> May 22 17:57:51 x200s ppp[3315]: tun0: Chat: Received: AT+CPIN?\^M\^M
>> May 22 17:57:51 x200s ppp[3315]: tun0: Chat: Received: +CPIN: SIM PIN\^M
>> May 22 17:57:51 x200s ppp[3315]: tun0: Chat: Received: \^M
>> May 22 17:57:51 x200s ppp[3315]: tun0: Chat: Received: OK\^M
>> May 22 17:57:56 x200s ppp[3315]: tun0: Chat: Expect timeout
>> May 22 17:57:56 x200s ppp[3315]: tun0: Chat: Send: AT+CPIN"****"\^M
>
> Yep. Here's (one of) your problem(s). Your chat script is telling ppp
> to expect "+CPIN: READY" but the device is actually sending
> you "+CPIN: SIM PIN" so you get the dreaded "Expect timeout"
>
> Your original chat line from above reads:
>>              AT+CPIN? +CPIN:\\sREADY-AT+CPIN\\\"****"\\\"-OK \
>
> It should read something like this:
>>              AT+CPIN? +CPIN:\\sSIM\\sPIN-AT+CPIN\\\"****"\\\"-OK \
>
> As mentioned above, I do not know whether or not sending your PIN to the
> device/carrier is necessary to unlock the device/account. Sometimes it
> is necessary, and sometimes it is not necessary.
>
>> May 22 17:57:56 x200s ppp[3315]: tun0: Phase: deflink: dial -> carrier
>> May 22 17:57:57 x200s ppp[3315]: tun0: Phase: deflink: carrier -> login
>> May 22 17:57:57 x200s ppp[3315]: tun0: Phase: deflink: login -> lcp
>> May 22 17:57:57 x200s ppp[3315]: tun0: LCP: FSM: Using "deflink" as a
transport
>> May 22 17:57:57 x200s ppp[3315]: tun0: LCP: deflink: State change Initial
--> Closed
>> May 22 17:57:57 x200s ppp[3315]: tun0: LCP: deflink: State change Closed
--> Stopped
>> May 22 17:57:58 x200s ppp[3315]: tun0: LCP: deflink: LayerStart
>> May 22 17:57:58 x200s ppp[3315]: tun0: LCP: deflink: SendConfigReq(1) state
= Stopped
>> May 22 17:57:58 x200s ppp[3315]: tun0: LCP:  ACFCOMP[2]
>> May 22 17:57:58 x200s ppp[3315]: tun0: LCP:  PROTOCOMP[2]
>> May 22 17:57:58 x200s ppp[3315]: tun0: LCP:  ACCMAP[6] 0x00000000
>> May 22 17:57:58 x200s ppp[3315]: tun0: LCP:  MRU[4] 1500
>> May 22 17:57:58 x200s ppp[3315]: tun0: LCP:  MAGICNUM[6] 0x1081a7d5
>> May 22 17:57:58 x200s ppp[3315]: tun0: LCP: deflink: State change Stopped
--> Req-Sent
>> May 22 17:58:01 x200s ppp[3315]: tun0: LCP: deflink: SendConfigReq(1) state
= Req-Sent
> ...
>> May 22 17:58:37 x200s ppp[3315]: tun0: Phase: Signal 15, terminate.
>> May 22 17:58:37 x200s ppp[3315]: tun0: Phase: PPP Terminated (normal).
>
> The above made absolutely no sense to me until I realized you had an
> extra double quote in your chat script which prevented it from dialing.
>
>       jcr
>
> --
> The OpenBSD Journal - http://www.undeadly.org

  • Re: J.C. Roberts
    • Re: patrick kristensen
      • Re: J.C. Roberts
        • Re: patrick kristensen
          • Re: J.C. Roberts
          • Re: patrick kristensen
          • Re: J.C. Roberts
          • Re: patrick kristensen
          • Re: J.C. Roberts
          • Re: Jussi Peltola
        • Re: Pete Vickers

Reply via email to