Shm shouldn't be mapped in the kernel, so large values won't be that bad.

On Jan 27, 2010, at 5:01 PM, Tobias Ulmer <tobi...@tmux.org> wrote:

On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 02:13:45PM -0700, Jeff Ross wrote:
I have searched (and searched) so I wonder if I'm running into the
i386 1GB limit I see referenced, as in the thread today about fsck
on larger partitions.

Yes you do. Also, kernel memory is limited, insane shm value will
probably (havn't looked at the code) have bad effects.

Reply via email to