On 01/25/2010 04:33 PM, nixlists wrote:
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 5:09 PM, Bret S. Lambert<bret.lamb...@gmail.com>
wrote:
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 04:35:48PM -0500, nixlists wrote:
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 4:12 PM, Marco Peereboom<sl...@peereboom.us>
wrote:
You are positively ignorant. No need to regurgitate this all over
again. Take your toy mail implementation and enjoy your hair.
You are still refusing to give a direct answer to a direct question.
How's that not ignorant? I wonder why that might be... All this "well,
we can't really tell what the hardware may do" crap isn't enough.
Perhaps you don't have an answer....
Y'know, if you don't get the fact that the answer you're being given
is that, ultimately, there really *isn't* an answer, you need some
more zen in your diet.
No, I've been given an answer for the RAID controllers (and even that
was nebulous), now let's hear it for the SATA.
Again. no write-back cache anywhere, no softupdates, no async mounts,
does the guarantee in the rename(2) apply to this case?
If it does, then say so . If it doesn't, then say so (and change the
man page, maybe?).
I'll just make one comment. Even if someone (truly authoritative) gives
a yes answer to this question, there is always Murphy's Law. Which I
think is a very simplified, non-technical synopsis of what several are
saying here.
