better than sparc64?
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 10:48:40PM -0500, Eric Furman wrote:
> On Fri, 22 Jan 2010 10:42 +0200, "Gregory Edigarov"
> <g...@bestnet.kharkov.ua> wrote:
> > Hello Everybody,
> >
> > I noticed it very every time that when question about security of
> > OpenBSD risen, at least one message states: "i386 architecture is
> > hardware insecure", and I really agree with it.
> >
> > Then my question is: in your opinion, what is the most secure
> > modern architecture that is supported by the manufacturer(let it be
> > not so mass, but resonable priced), to run OpenBSD on?
>
> Any that's not intel, is the short answer.
> Alpha was the best,, which is of course why it's dead now.
> On Alpha even if the software had a buffer over run it could
> not be exploited, because of the way the architecture
> handled its memory.
