On Fri, 22 Jan 2010 10:42 +0200, "Gregory Edigarov" <g...@bestnet.kharkov.ua> wrote: > Hello Everybody, > > I noticed it very every time that when question about security of > OpenBSD risen, at least one message states: "i386 architecture is > hardware insecure", and I really agree with it. > > Then my question is: in your opinion, what is the most secure > modern architecture that is supported by the manufacturer(let it be > not so mass, but resonable priced), to run OpenBSD on?
Any that's not intel, is the short answer. Alpha was the best,, which is of course why it's dead now. On Alpha even if the software had a buffer over run it could not be exploited, because of the way the architecture handled its memory.
