On 25 September 2009 11:49:48 Henning Brauer wrote:
> On 25 September 2009 08:34:03 Vadim Zhukov wrote:
> > So as far as I can understand, pf_rule.rdr pool is used for
> > route-to/reply-to/dup-to options. Now I have a few stupid questions:
> >
> > 1. Is it intended to have only one address pool for
> > rdr-to/route-to/reply-to/dup-to options in the rule? Or did I
> > misinterpreted something?
>
> this was intended but is a bit nasty so we'll go for a seperate pool
> for the route stuff (route-to/reply-to/dup-to)
Thank you very much for your reply. Should I wait for this change to
happen at least until 4.7 branched, or go alone? Just do not want to do
unneeded work.
--
Best wishes,
Vadim Zhukov
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?
