On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 8:59 AM, Gaby Vanhegan<g...@vanhegan.net> wrote: > I'd gathered that from reading one of those threads to the end. I really > wanted to avoid having to build a custom kernel, especially if the results > might not even work. I suppose I was just inquiring about the status of > bigmem in 4.5 and if it is considered "safe" to use yet?
it is not "safe" to use yet. if it was, it'd be enabled by default. that being said, it works for some people on some machines. it works on my amd workstation but not my intel laptop. CK -- GDB has a 'break' feature; why doesn't it have 'fix' too?
