Hello ,
> * irix <i...@ukr.net> [2009-05-27 18:12]: >> But I can not understand why you are sure that traffic can only >> outlet Shape > > i can not understand why you want to shape outlets. > > you don't understand that inbound shaping doesn't work because you > have obviously no idea how the network stack works. there is no > suitable queue inbound to do any queueing on. the ipintrq is way too > early. so to do any inbound shaping you had to insert another queueing > step, which is as clever as drinking water from the dead sea when > you're thirsty. or maybe one could rape the ipintrq somehow. but i > don't and won't rape. > by shaping the incoming traffic, I mean simple dropper without constructing queues. All that the above specified speed dropped until the flow becomes less than or equal to specified speed. That actually makes CDNR, which arrears. >> But it pains me to see the obvious defects in my favorite system, > > interestingly, in the 6 years since I did the altq/pf merge, you're > the only one to see that "obvious defect" > >> and complete indifference on the part of developers to the obvious defects. > > obviously the developers have no clue about what they are doing, and > the milestones they have to meet by the contract they have with you understood the joke. Funny -- Best regards, irix mailto:i...@ukr.net
