2009/5/18 Toma Bod ar <tomas.bod...@gmail.com>: > Common,you think that big western companies which have support from > western governments care about it?And please don't make white knight > from western civilization.Everywhere are pros and cons.What type of > copyright and intellectual property you think?Like Disney which have > stories based on older stories,but he has law from government on it > now so original makers has nothing and Disney takes all?And when end > of this copyright is near some "magic" happen in government and Disney > (and others) has next 20 or 50 years.Sounds very respectable for > copyright and intellectual property of original authors ;-) > > Or maybe you think something like we have.When you create your own > song and sing it to people somewhere outside of your flat you must pay > to OSA(something like BSA terrorists,but local).WTH is that.Sounds > really like care about my copyright - I must pay for my own song ;-) > > Informations are here for share and we can move forward thanks to > them.If some idiot have patent on double-click then what?One developer > must incorporated triple-click to his product,next four-click and so > on?Sounds like history - Earth is just pancake and everyone who want > to find another idea must use our idea or he will be killed and who > use our idea without our licence will be killed too.Really we need > those times back??????
For Christ's sake, get off your fucking high horse. My quip was in response to your implication that China chose a BSD license because it fit better with their intentions than GPL or similar. As if they gave a shit. -HKS > > 2009/5/18 (private) HKS <hks.priv...@gmail.com>: >> 2009/5/17 Toma Bod ar <tomas.bod...@gmail.com>: >>> I know,that's why they choose BSD-style licenced OS ;-) >> >> Yes, because China's respect for copyright and intellectual property >> is legendary. >> >> -HKS >> >> >>> 2009/5/17 Cem Kayali <cemkay...@eticaret.com.tr>: >>>> >>>> Do you really think Chineese governmnt make source public? Not all of >> course >>>> ;) >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Jesus Sanchez, 05/17/09 20:58: >>>>> >>>>> TomC!E! BodE>C!r escribiC3: >>>>>> >>>>>> After quick search on web it looks like it's based on FreeBSD 5.3 >>>>>> (initial version) with Windows like GUI.So it doesn't looks so secure >>>>>> now :-) But government agencies must have reason to receive money so >>>>>> why don't make "wave" about dangerous China with their new >>>>>> ultra-hyper-super secure system? Ofcourse that there can be >>>>>> interesting modifications.Maybe I will try it in Qemu :-) >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> the chinese government really feels so vulnerable against U.S.? >>>>> i mean, they say it like "the WWIII will begin soon and we need >>>>> to defend us on the cyberspace with our super-secure OS" >>>>> >>>>> and after all they based it on FreeBSD? I'm a OpenBSD user and >>>>> I really feel that I've enought privacy, don't need a >>>>> super-secret-ultra-secure OS >>>>> nor to say "Made In China" xD >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> Dne 17. kvD ten 2009 19:28 TomC!E! BodE>C!r <tomas.bod...@gmail.com> >>>>>> napsal(a): >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Everyone can try it >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >> http://www.honeytechblog.com/downlod-kylin-operating-system-by-chinaqingbo-wu >>>>>> / >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 2009/5/17 Duncan Patton a Campbell <campb...@neotext.ca>: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I just noticed this: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> http://www.physorg.com/news161355225.html >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> about a "secure" os that's been under >>>>>>>> development in China since around 2k >>>>>>>> and is now being deployed by the Chinese >>>>>>>> Gov. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Interestingly, it is built for a "hardened" >>>>>>>> CPU that, I'd guess, lacks many of the advanced >>>>>>>> "features" of iNTel architecture cpus. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Anybody have any more info on this? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Dhu
